| |||||||
| |||||||
|
Learn
|
Learn |
||||||
The Question of Medical SupervisionSome of you have complained that your physicians have never heard of artemisinin or that they accepted at face value whatever was said by Merck about the therapeutic efficacy of Gardasil. Moreover, if you or your physicians first insist upon solid answers to all of the questions we might want to ask about the use of Gardasil and/or artemisinin--if that is your criteria for trying this approach--then you would do well to check back in, say, ten years. Is there a contradiction here? Not really. Our intent is not to refer people to their physicians with "a wink and a nod." People absolutely should consult with their physicians in all aspects of their medical care. That said, you're still your own person. We are inviting you to connect the dots using your own due diligence and good judgment. Whatever you decide, we wish you the very best of luck.
Update (9-29-09): It has been about 18 months since we first wrote about this issue. The above comments still stand, but now that we have resigned from the RRP Task Force, I believe that it's time to shift gears. About the same time I posted the reasons for our resignation on the main website, a patient in the military initiated an RRP Forum post that, serendipitously, spoke to the very issue that is the subject-matter of this website page. Readers may wish to reference that post and view our response here. |
|||||||